Uniportal thoracic surgery
Initial experience
Abstract
Introduction: video assisted thoracic surgery is widely accepted today as a safe, feasible and effective procedure to treat almost all thoracic conditions. In 2010, uniportal complex procedures begin to appear in scientific publications around the world, evidencing major expansion. This surgical approach is at least comparable to the multiportal approach in terms of postoperative results or even in regards to pain, intercostal neuralgia and length of hospital stay. We performed a retrospective study of uniportal procedures between September 2018 and August 2020.
Results: 40 patients underwent uniportal thoracic surgeries. 18 of these were subject to anatomic resections (45%), 19 to atypical resection (non-anatomic), one thymectomy and two pleural biopsies, 12 lobectomies (30%), 3 neumomectomies (7,5%) and 3 segmentomectomies (7,5%). In 6 patients the procedure was converted to an open surgery (15%) and one patient died for respiratory sepsis. As to the occurrence of complications, 8 complications were seen in anatomic resections (5 major complications) and 4 complications in non-anatomic resections (2 major complications). One patient reported pain that lasted over one week in the postoperative stage, another one referred paresthesia and two reported dyspnea. Length of stay in the hospital was 8 days in anatomic resections and 5.8 days of pleural drainage, whereas in non-anatomic resections it was 5.5 and 3.3 respectively.
Conclusion: uniportal surgery is safe and feasible in a relatively small health center.
References
2) Drevet G, Ugalde Figueroa P. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: safety, efficacy and learning curve during the first 250 cases in Quebec, Canada. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5(2):100-6.
3) Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, Toloza E, Burfeind WR, Harpole DH, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244(3):420-5.
4) Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139(4):976-81.
5) Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77(2):726-8.
6) Gonzalez D, Paradela M, Garcia J, de la Torre M. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12(3):514-5.
7) Bourdages-Pageau E, Vieira A, Lacasse Y, Figueroa PU. Outcomes of uniportal vs multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 32(1):145-51.
8) Koryllos A, Stoelben E. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sleeve resections for non-small cell lung cancer patients: an observational prospective study and technique analysis. J Vis Surg 2018; 4:16.
9) Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, de la Torre M, Mendez L, Fernandez R. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy and other complex resections. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6(Suppl 6):S674-681.
10) Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Xi Y, Tan L, Wang Q. Single- versus multiple-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a propensity-matched study†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49 (Suppl 1):i48-53.
11) Wang L, Liu D, Lu J, Zhang S, Yang X. The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy. BMC Cancer 2017; 17(1):75.
12) Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28(1):43-6.
13) Ismail M, Nachira D. Devising the guidelines: the concept of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery-instrumentation and operatory room staff. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11(Suppl 16):S2079-85.
14) Tosi D, Nosotti M, Bonitta G, Mazzucco A, Righi I, Mendogni P, et al. Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019; 29(5):714-21.
15) Nachira D, Meacci E, Ismail M, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Margaritora S. Why to change from multiportal to uniportal VATS? Video-Assist Thorac Surg. 2018; 3:14-14.
16) Saji H, Tsuboi M, Yoshida K, Kato Y, Nomura M, Matsubayashi J, et al. Prognostic impact of number of resected and involved lymph nodes at complete resection on survival in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6(11):1865-71.
17) Shimada Y. What could be the key elements to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes sampled? J Thorac Dis 2017; 9(3):E290-1.
18) Zhong WZ, Liu SY, Wu YL. Numbers or stations: from systematic sampling to individualized lymph node dissection in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35(11):1143-5.
19) Rocco G, Martucci N, La Manna C, Jones DR, De Luca G, La Rocca A, et al. Ten-year experience on 644 patients undergoing single-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96(2):434-8.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
