Surgical treatment of acetabular fracture

Clinicalradiological results and its complications

  • Camilo Martínez ASSE-INOT, Banco de Prótesis
  • Rogelio Rey INOT, Subdirector. Universidad de la Rrepúbica, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica de Traumatología y Ortopedia. Prof. Adj
Keywords: ACETABULUM, BONE FRACTURES, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, TREATMENT OUTCOME

Abstract

Introduction: acetabular lesions are inusual. Treatment is complex and it requires research center on this condition.
Objective: to analyse for the first time in our country, a series of consecutive cases of surgically treated acetabular fractures, evaluating middle-term clinical and radiological results, studying each complication.
Method: a retrospective analysis of clinical histories, surgical forms and X-rays was performed for 42 patients who underwent surgery in two centers (Instituto Nacional de Ortopedia y Traumatología [INOT] and Banco de Prótesis), from July 2001 through August 2007. The different factors affecting the evolution of patients were studied.
Results: the negative clinical and radiological results, as well as the emergence of complications were closely related to the type of lesion (worse in these complex lesions),to poor reductions, to age older than 40 years old, to delay in surgery and to surgeons with lower number of surgeries performed (70% compared to 35% more experienced surgeons). Five cases required hip arthroplasty, three of which resulted form severe articular infection.
The eight deep infections evidence negative clinical-radiological results. Other complications included two vascular lesions, six epiphyseal necrosis and seven sciatic nerve palsy (post-traumatic or post-surgery).
Conclusions: they are serious lesions, difficult to treat and present high levels of complications, what dramatically drops when young patients are operated early, when patients undergo simple lesions that do not include hip luxation, and when they are treated by more experienced surgeons who manage to perform anatomic reduction

References

(1) Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (151): 81-106.
(2) Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46-A: 1615-46.
(3) Tannast M, Krüger A, Mack PW, Powell JN, Hosalkar S, Siebenrock KA. Surgical dislocation of the hip for the fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (6): 842-52.
(4) D'Aubigné RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36-A (3): 451-75.
(5) Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 205: 220-40.
(6) Ragnarsson B. Mjöberg B.Arthrosis after surgically treated acetabular fracture: a retrospective study of 60 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63 (5): 511-4.
(7) Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (11): 1632-45.
(8) Weber M, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (9): 1295-305.
(9) Ellis T, Schmidt A. Total hip arthroplasty after failed open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Tech Orthop 2003; 17 (4): 427-33.
(10) Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed.: Springer Verlag, 1993: 364-73.
(11) Matta J. Operative indications and choice of surgical approach for fractures of the acetabulum. Tech Orthop 1986; 1: 13-22.
(12) Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M. Outcome of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years' follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (2): 229-36.
(13) Fassler PR, Swiontkowski MF, Kilroy AW, Routt ML Jr. Injury of the sciatic nerve associated with acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (8): 1157-66.
(14) Giannoudis PV, Da Costa AA, Raman R, Mohamed AK, Smith RM. Double-crush syndrome after acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (3): 401-7.
(15) Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (8): 1629-32.
(16) Moed BR, Karges DE. Prophylactic indomethacin for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery in high-risk patients. J Orthop Trauma 1994; 8 (1): 34-9.
(17) Blokhuis TJ, Frölke JP. Is radiation superior to indomethacin to prevent heterotopic ossification in acetabular fractures? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (2): 526-30.
Published
2011-12-31
How to Cite
1.
Martínez C, Rey R. Surgical treatment of acetabular fracture. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2011Dec.31 [cited 2024Nov.24];27(4):211-9. Available from: http://www2.rmu.org.uy/ojsrmu311/index.php/rmu/article/view/370