Analysis of reconsultations in a pediatric emergency service
Abstract
Reconsultations are an indicator of the quality of care. Learning about their characteristics allows planning strategies for continuous quality of care improvement.
Objective:
To describe the characteristics of reconsultations within the first 72 hours in a Pediatric Emergency (PE) service during January, April, July and October of 2017.
Methods:
Descriptive, retrospective study through the review of electronic medical records of the PE service of a private health care provider in Montevideo. Variables: frequency, age, sex, time, reason for consultation and evolution.
Results:
During the time analyzed, there were 8299 visits and 476 reconsultations. 54 reconsultations were excluded because they were due to conditions other than the one in the initial visit. 422 were included in the study, representing 5.1%. Median age was 4 years. Reasons for reconsultations: persistence of symptoms 204 (48%), disease evolution 73 (17%), control 59 (14%), tests pending 51 (12%), worsening 30 (7%), a different diagnosis 5 (14%). After the second visit 88% were discharged to their homes and 11.5% were admitted. No child was referred to the intensive care unit, and none of them died.
Conclusions:
The rate of reconsultations in this service is similar to that reported in other series. Upon analyzing the reason for reconsultations, it is necessary to improve clinical management, developing communication strategies with parents and carers and strengthening outpatient visits and counter-referral to the first level of care. It is important to repeat the study after the implementation of plans to improve clinical management.
References
(1) Reynoso N, Fattore M, Hourbeigt M, González M, García Domínguez R. Análisis de los pacientes que reconsultaron a un Servicio de Emergencias Pediátricas de un Hospital Materno Infantil como indicador de calidad asistencial. Med Infantil 2015; 22(3):219-25.
(2) Oterino D, Peiró S, Calvo R, Sutil P, Fernández O, Pérez G, et al. Utilización inadecuada de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario. Una evaluación con criterios explícitos. Gac Sanit 1999; 13(5):361-70.
(3) Guardia M, Costa J, Pizá A, García J, Pou J, Luaces C. Análisis de los pacientes readmitidos con ingreso como indicador de calidad asistencial de un servicio de urgencias pediátricas. Emergencias 2013; 15:351-6.
(4) Mintegui S, Benito J, Vázquez MA, Ortiz A, Capapé A, Fernández A. Los niños que repiten consulta en urgencias de pediatría. An Esp Pediatr 2000; 52:542-7.
(5) Ali AB, Place R, Howell J, Malubay SM. Early pediatric emergency department return visits: a prospective patient-centric assesment. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2012; 51:651-8.
(6) Benito F, Fernández M, González S, Luaces C, Velazco R, González A, coord. Indicadores de calidad SEUP (Revisión 2018). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría, 2018.
(7) Rivas García A, Manrique Martín G, Butragueño Laiseca L, Mesa García S, Campos Segura A, Fernández Iglesia V, et al. Hiperfrecuentadores en urgencias. ¿Quiénes son? ¿Por qué consultan? An Pediatr (Barc) 2017; 86:67-75.
(8) Uruguay. Ministerio de Salud Pública, González T, Olesker D, comps. La construcción del Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud 2005-2009. Montevideo: MSP, 2010. Disponible en: https://psico.edu.uy/sites/default/files/cursos/nas_la_construccion.pdf (Consulta: 14 oct. 2018).
(9) Mokate K. Eficacia, eficiencia, equidad y sostenibilidad: ¿qué queremos decir? Washington D.C.: BID, 1999. Disponible en:
https://www.cepal.org/ilpes/noticias/paginas/9/37779/gover_2006_03_eficacia_eficiencia.pdf (Consulta: 7 nov. 2018).
(10) Jiménez-Puente A, Del Río-Mata J, Arjona-Huertas J, Mora-Ordóñez B, Nieto-de Haro L, Lara-Blanquer A, et al. Causas de los retornos durante las 72 horas siguientes al alta de urgencias. Emergencias 2015; 27:287-93.
(11) Grupo de Trabajo SEMES-Insalud. Calidad en los servicios de urgencias: indicadores de calidad. Emergencias 2001; 13:60-5.
(12) Alcaraz Martínez J, Blanco Linares M, González Soler M, López Picazo T, Lorenzo Zapata M, Martínez Bienvenido E. Eventos adversos en los servicios de urgencias: revisión de reconsultas como fuente de datos. Rev Calid Asist 2010; 25(3):129-35.
