El estado civil materno y su asociación con los resultados perinatales en una población hospitalaria

Gonzalo A. Sotero Salgueiro; Claudio G. Sosa Fuertes; Álvaro Domínguez Rama; Justo Alonso Telechea; Raúl Medina Milanesi

Gonzalo A. Sotero Salgueiro Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Clínica Ginecotocológica "B", Prof. Adj.
Claudio G. Sosa Fuertes Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Clínica Ginecotocológica "C", Ex Asistente. Docente Honorario
Álvaro Domínguez Rama Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Clínica Ginecotocológica "C", Ex Asistente. Docente Honorario
Justo Alonso Telechea Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Clínica Ginecotocológica "C", Prof. Titular
Raúl Medina Milanesi Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Clínica Ginecotocológica "B", Prof. Titular

Keywords: MARITAL STATUS, NEWBORN, LOW WEIGHT AT BIRTH, BIRTH WEIGHT, FETAL DEATH

Abstract

Background: The study aims at determining association between maternal marital status and perinatal characteristics in pregnant women treated in the Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell.
Methods: Association between maternal marital status and perinatal characteristics was studied in 41.011 newborns during five years. Results were adjusted for different risk factors using logistic and lineal regression models.
Results: Single mother status was associated with low birth weight (adjusted Odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02-1.20) and fetal death ([aOR] = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.24-1.83). Other related factors associated with low birth weight and fetal death were as follow: unadequate prenatal control, history of low birth weight and fetal death. Smoking was associated with an increase of low birth weight (aOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.23-1.39).
Conclusions: Findings agreed with international results on the association marital status and other risk factors with perinatal characteristics.

References

1) Rantakallio P, Oja H. Perinatal risk for infants of unmarried mothers over a period of 20 years. Early Hum Dev 1990; 22(3):157-69.
2) Ahmed F. Unmarried mothers as a high-risk group for adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Community Health 1990; 15(1): 35-44.
3) de-Sanjose S, Roman E. Low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age babies in Scotland, 1981-1984. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45(3): 207-10.
4) Algert C, Roberts C, Adelson P, Frommer M. Low birth-weight in NSW, 1987: a population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33(3): 243-8.
5) McIntosh LJ, Roumayah NE, Bottoms SF. Perinatal outcome of broken marriage in the inner city. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(2): 233-6.
6) Holt VL, Danoff NL, Mueller BA, Swanson MW. The association of change in maternal marital status between births and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the second birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11 Suppl 1: 31-40.
7) Luo ZC, Wilkins R, Kramer MS. Disparities in pregnancy outcomes according to marital and cohabitation status. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(6): 1300-7.
8) Jonas O, Roder D, Chan A. The association of maternal and socioeconomic characteristics in metropolitan Adelaide with medical, obstetric and labour complications and pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 32(1): 1-5.
9) Kurup A, Viegas O, Singh K, Ratnam SS. Pregnancy outcome in unmarried teenage nulligravidae in Singapore. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1989; 30(4): 305-11.
10) Bor W, McGee TR, Fagan AA. Early risk factors for adolescent antisocial behaviour: an Australian longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2004; 38(5): 365-72.
11) Perez R, Patience T, Pulous E, Brown G, McEwen A, Asato A, et al. Use of a focussed teen prenatal clinic at a military teaching hospital: model for improved outcomes of unmarried mothers. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38(3): 280-3.
12) Díaz-Rossello JL. Health services research, outcomes, and perinatal information systems. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998; 10(2): 117-22.
13) Simini F. Perinatal information system (SIP): a clinical database in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet 1999; 354(9172): 75.
14) Cheung YB. Marital status and mortality in British women: a longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol 2000; 29(1): 93-9.
15) Waldron I, Hughes ME, Brooks TL. Marriage protection and marriage selection–prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43(1): 113-23.
16) Ryan GM, Jr, Sweeney PJ, Solola AS. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137(8): 876-81.
17) Belizan JM, Villar J, Belizan MZ, Garrote N. [Care of pregnant women in prenatal services in public maternity hospitals of Rosario, Argentina]. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1979; 86(2): 121-30.
18) Raymond EG, Cnattingius S, Kiely JL. Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101(4): 301-6.
19) Ahlenius I, Thomassen P. The changing panorama of late fetal death in Sweden between 1984 and 1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78(5): 408-14.
20) Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB, Davis RO. Risk factors for fetal death in white, black, and Hispanic women. Collaborative Group on Preterm Birth Prevention. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84(4): 490-5.
21) Harter L, Starzyk P, Frost F. A comparative study of hospital fetal death records and Washington State fetal death certificates. Am J Public Health 1986; 76(11): 1333-4.
22) Greb AE, Pauli RM, Kirby RS. Accuracy of fetal death reports: comparison with data from an independent stillbirth assessment program. Am J Public Health 1987; 77(9): 1202-6.

Maternal marital status - perinatal characteristics. Association in an hospitalized population

Abstract

References

Follow on Twitter