Uruguayan consensus on asthma management

  • Marcos Carámbula
  • María Julia Saráchaga
Keywords: ASTHMA, URUGUAY

Abstract

The diversity of approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma and the multiplication of guides, norms and consensus for its management, which for years have pointed in the same direction, led us to bring together different specialists from all over the country to unify criteria. in this sense in our environment.
The existing data in the international arena and the norms for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma, published in 1993 by the Department of Pneumology of the University of the Republic, are the basis of this publication.
In the spirit that the results of this effort reach all members of the health team, we have proposed not only to involve representatives of all levels and specialties in its preparation, but also to widely disseminate it.
To achieve this purpose, a survey on the knowledge of general practitioners about the aforementioned documents was previously carried out. It was also sought to bring together representatives from all over the country, from all levels of care, adult physicians and pediatricians. We have had the participation of former professors of internal medicine, professors of all departments and scientific societies related to the subject. In the last two years, meetings and workshops were held, the result of which is the one that is being considered.

References

1) American Thoracic Society. Standardization of Spirometry. 1994 Update. Am J Respir Care 1995; 1195; 152:1107-36.
2) Barnes PJ, Rodger IW, Thomson NC. ASTHMA. 3ª ed. London: Academic Press, 1998.
3) Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de la República. Cátedra de Neumología. Normas para el Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del Asma Bronquial. Montevideo: Facultad de Medicina, 1993.
4) National Institutes of Health. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. NHLBI/WHO Workshop Report. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1995 (Nº 95-3659).
5) National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1997 (Nº 97-4051).
6) National Institutes of Health. Highlights of the Expert Panel Report 2. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1997 (Nº 97-4051A).
7) British Thoracic Society. The British guidelines on asthma management 1995 review and position statement. Thorax 1997; 52 (Suppl 1):S1-S21.
8) Godfrey S, Kamburoff PL, Nairn JR. Spirometry, lung volumes and airway resistance in normal children aged 5 to 18 years. Br J Dis Chest 1970; 64: 15-24.
9) Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría. (Consenso Nacional). Asma bronquial en la infancia: criterios de diagnóstico y tratamiento. Arch Arg Pediatr 1995; 93: 199-223.
10) Polgar G, Promedhat V. Pulmonary function testing in children: techniques and standards. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971.
11) Silverman M. Childhood Asthma and other wheezing disorders. London: Chapman and Hall Medical, 1995.
Published
2002-09-30
How to Cite
1.
Carámbula M, Saráchaga MJ. Uruguayan consensus on asthma management. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2002Sep.30 [cited 2024Nov.17];18(2):122-47. Available from: http://www2.rmu.org.uy/ojsrmu311/index.php/rmu/article/view/977